Bringing innovation to pumped energy storage

A fascinating insight from RheEnergise’s CEO Stephen Crosher on bringing innovation to pumped energy storage with a new solution – High-Density Hydro. This scalable and cost-effective energy storage solution for society’s energy transition offers many benefits. Low cost – building on over 100 years’ experience with the most widely used form of energy storage. Agility – by innovating in the R-19 high-density fluid they use, they unlock many hundreds more suitable sites. Clean – R-19 is environmentally benign, and has been engineered to be non-reactive and non-corrosive. In addition, their plants require smaller footprints, and have minimal recyclability and supply chain considerations.

For more information on RheEnergise, visit: https://www.rheenergise.com/

Technology to improve air quality

Bertrand Rotagnon of Carrier – a leading global provider of innovative HVAC and other automation technologies joined acumen7’s March session to explain that Carrier has developed technology to manage the air quality in buildings to ensure that they are healthy buildings. Poor air quality impacts individuals’ health and productivity, and of course is currently a focus given the pandemic as well. There are three elements to the technology – effectively an air purifier, an air source pump which also helps manage the moisture in the air and UV lighting. The system is effective at removing COVID-19 virus particles, amongst other things, from the air being brought into the building from outside. (It’s good news for hay fever sufferers too.) Further, there is a system that can manage entrances and exits, to ensure a building remains clean. This GPS technology has been available in the USA for the last 10 years and all of the technology can be retrofitted to existing buildings. Five hospitals in France are currently utilising it and it has also been rolled out across classrooms in the USA. There may also be the opportunity to install in on trains and underground systems, the latter being home to some of poorest air quality we breathe. 

For more information on Carrier, visit: https://www.carrier.com/carrier/en/worldwide/

Advanced nuclear for Net Zero

acumen7 were treated to another fascinating presentation from the University of Cambridge’s Tony Roulstone. Tony gave an overview of advanced nuclear – fusion and fission – and how they might play into net zero by 2050. The UK has been at the forefront of both, but things are different now, with both the UK and others around the world looking again at the possibilities of vastly increased energy from nuclear. An interesting development is the importance of private equity – three of the five projects described are privately funded, which was unheard of in fusion until now. 

For more information on the University of Cambridge’s Nuclear Energy Centre, visit: https://www.cnec.group.cam.ac.uk/depts

Technology for a low carbon world

Nova Pangaea’s Strategic Advisor, Barry Hedley, illustrated how the cleantech business has created a revolutionary and proprietary patented process. ‘REFNOVA’ converts discarded plant biomass into natural chemicals and biofuels, and is highly efficient, reliable, clean and adaptable. Making use of plant by-products that are currently going to waste replaces the need for industry to use fossil fuels and create synthetic chemicals. The process enjoys quality and cost advantages over all known competitive technologies, as well as offering dramatic potential returns to users, even at low oil prices.

For more information on Nova Pangaea, visit: Biomass Processing Experts | Nova Pangaea Technologies.

 

Climate Risk Reporting: What Directors should know, right now

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TFCD), chaired by Michael Bloomberg, has been quietly working away on recommendations for corporate reporting of climate change risk. Companies will almost immediately need to take action. As the Wall Street Journal reports: “Working out who might be hit next is challenging for investors. The potential impact and costs of climate change are complex to estimate, particularly given the long time horizon and range of pathways the world might take as it tries to decarbonize. By forcing companies to work through different scenarios publicly, the TCFD reporting should bring some much-needed clarity to risks outside of obvious problem sectors like oil and gas. It should also shed light on climate leaders and laggards within sectors.”

Please see the link to an Insight from acumen7 member Peter Dixon, looking at what Directors should know, right now:

201120 Peter Dixon Insight – Climate Risk Reporting – What Directors Should Know Right Now

 

Net Zero carbon homes: Is hydrogen the solution?

Moving over to a hydrogen economy is a major strategic decision that needs to be made soon

In its Future Homes Standard proposals, which are set to take effect from 2025, the government favours a combination of high energy efficiency standards combined with the use of heat pumps for heating new homes. But heat pumps are expensive to install and work best in well insulated homes, so might a shift to hydrogen work best for existing homes to meet the 2050 net zero carbon target as this would allow the continued use of gas boilers?

For this to happen the government needs to make a major strategic decision whether to back a hydrogen economy. This is because the gas grid must be either shut down or turned over fully to hydrogen.

If the network is switched off, then the government will need to press ahead with the proposed ban on gas boilers and insist on the use of air and ground source heat pumps, or direct electrical heating, along with rigorous installation standards. If the network is converted to hydrogen, then new builds could be equipped with whichever heating source is most economic at that point in time.

It may well be economic for large scale housing developments to be equipped with district heating systems, but again, the energy source is dependent upon whether hydrogen is available or not, and thus subject to the same uncertainty as for individual houses. But the decision is perhaps more urgent since the investment is for over a longer period than for say, a heat pump or boiler.

The big issue is existing homes, where some are connected to the gas grid, and some are not. If there is a hydrogen grid, then hydrogen boilers can be used, and in an interim period, boilers would need to be convertible from natural gas to hydrogen. Alternatively, depending upon the relative prices of hydrogen and mains electricity, then it would be viable for many homes to be equipped with air source or ground source heat pumps. Interim solutions include ‘hybrid heat pump / gas’ systems, where gas or hydrogen can be used to ‘top up’ the heat extracted from the heat pump so it is hot enough for radiators. Heat pump systems are increasingly prevalent today, although a major retraining programme for installers and maintainers will be required, as even many highly proficient technicians are unfamiliar with the different technology.

Homes that aren’t connected to the gas grid and are unsuitable for heat pump technology would need to be equipped with direct electric and/or biomass heating.

If the government decides to back hydrogen where we would get it from? Steam methane reforming of natural gas is the dominant commercial technology, and currently produces hydrogen on a large scale but by its nature is not low carbon. It is essential that carbon capture and storage is combined with the process.

Electrolytic hydrogen production, also known as electrolysis, splits water into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity in an electrolysis cell. Electrolysis produces pure hydrogen which is ideal for low temperature fuel cells, for example in electric vehicles. Commercial electrolysers are on the market and have been in use for many years. Electrolysis is calculated to be more costly than methane reforming; however, it is clear to see that both methods may imply cost penalties over direct use of electricity.

Although hydrogen production facilities already exist at scale significant investment would be needed to produce the vast quantities of hydrogen needed to replace natural gas.

The lead times look very long on this decision as all new heating systems, whether fully electric or hydrogen based would need to be fully operational 10-15 years ahead of 2050. A hydrogen grid would also fulfil many other energy needs including transport which means the decision needs to be made even earlier. The Committee on Climate Change says that work needs to start on building a hydrogen grid by 2030.

Given the time scales within which actions must be taken, the government must soon make the major strategic decision as to whether to back a hydrogen economy or abandon the network altogether. It is thus in the interests of the housing industry to lobby hard now for a rapid and transparent consultation and decision process, since, as always, uncertainty is the enemy of good decisions, and the driver of increased costs.

Peter Dixon is a member of acumen7, and director of Kepler Energy and Barn Energy

This article was first published by Housing Today on 28 August 2020: https://www.housingtoday.co.uk/comment/net-zero-carbon-homes-is-hydrogen-the-solution/5107605.article

Photo: Worcester Bosch’s hydrogen-fired boiler